Correction: Please note that there are misleading differences in the 1 week returns. Due to an oversight by your editor in a recent adjustment to defining 1 week returns in the R code that generates results, this time horizon isn’t identical in all the data tables below. In some cases, “1 week” reflects trailing 5-day results vs. calendar-week results in other cases, which sometimes are 4 days due to holidays. As such, please ignore the 1-week results and related commentary for 1-week data. I’ll correct the mistake starting with the next issue. For the other time windows, the numbers are correct. Apologies for the confusion. And thank you to Dan, a reader, for pointing out this issue.
In this issue:
Global stock markets rebound, led by Asia ex-Japan shares
Portfolio strategy benchmarks rally
Managed risk strategies struggle
The bull market revives: Equity markets around the world closed higher this week. Last week’s stumble inspired a new round of worries, but a lot can change in a week. For now, the bulls show no signs that they’re ready to throw in the towel on the post-coronavirus-crash recovery.
This week’s top performer: stocks in Asia sans Japan shares. The iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF (AAXJ) surged, rising 3.6% this week through Friday, Jan. 22. The rally left the fund just below a record high, which was set on Thursday. Much of the fund’s upside is due to strong gains in China- and Taiwan-listed names, which represent 44% and 15% of the portfolio, respectively, as of Jan. 21, according to iShares.
Macro factors played a roll in the bubbly prices. China this week reported that its economy rose 2.3% last year. That’s a weak performance by China’s standards, but in the context of a global pandemic the gain is impressive. Indeed, the increase in output marks one of the few economies to end 2020 with a full-year expansion.
Stocks generally had a good week, including US shares, which rallied 1.9% via Vanguard Total US Stock Market (VTI). The power shift in Washington this week hasn’t rattled Wall Street, at least not yet. By some accounts, the Biden administration’s push for more stimulus/relief is bullish for the near term since it raises the odds that the economy will stabilize/rebound in the months ahead. There’s the question of whether we’re in a buy-the-rumor-sell-the-news scenario, but for the moment the arrival of Team Biden hasn’t frightened the bulls.
The losers this week on our list of ETF proxies for the major asset classes is limited to foreign bonds, US investment-grade corporates, commodities and shares in Latin America, which posted the biggest decline for the fund set in the table below.
The iShares Latin America 40 ETF (ILF) tumbled 3.9% this week, adding to the previous week’s modest decline. The depth of the recent slide raises questions anew about the fund’s recovery of late. Despite ILF’s recent rally, it never regained its pre-coronavirus heights, in contrast with most of corners of the equity world. The next couple of weeks will be a test of whether ILF has the right stuff to keep the rebound alive.
US bonds were mixed this week. While investment-grade corporates slipped, Treasuries continued to stabilize. For a second week, iShares 7-10 Treasury Bond (IEF) was up fractionally. Is this a sign that the recent rise in yields (and the commensurate fall in bond prices) has run its course? Too soon to say, although the bearish momentum profile for IEF remains intact, as indicated by the fund’s low MOM score in the table above. (For details on all the risk metrics as well as the strategies and benchmarks, see this summary.)
Perhaps next week, the first full week for the Biden administration and its policy agenda, will drop critical clues that will shape the bond market’s next act.
Strong gains for strategy benchmarks: After a modest setback in the previous week, our four strategy benchmarks posted strong gains. The Global Beta 16 Index (G.B16) led the field with a robust 1.4% rally. G.B16, a global 60/30/10 mix of stocks, bonds and alternative asset classes (commodities and real estate) regained all of its previous week’s loss and then some.
Notably, all the strategy benchmarks are again posting impressive year-to-date results. It’s still January, of course, and so there’s still plenty of room for doubt and debate about what lies ahead this year. But G.B16’s opening 2021 bid of 2.9% gain reminds that optimism is still alive and kicking.
Mixed results for managed risk portfolios: In contrast with strong gains for the strategy benchmarks, our managed risk portfolios struggled this week.
Global Minimum Volatility (G.B16.MINV) led in this corner with a moderate 0.4% gain, although that still leaves the strategy down slightly year to date.
Global Managed Volatility (G.B16.MVOL) was a close second this week with a 0.3% advance, which brings the strategy to a 2.5% year-to-date increase. Note that G.B16.MVOL is again all in with a risk-on profile after the lone risk-off bucket (commodities via WisdomTree Continuous Commodity Index Fund (GCC)) flipped today.
By contrast, Global Managed Drawdown (G.B16.MDD) continues to signal risk-off for nearly half of its funds. (Note: all three risk-managed portfolios use the same G.B16 opportunity set per the table above.)
BlackRock’s four asset allocation funds rose moderately this week, albeit well behind the gains for the strategy benchmarks listed above. Nonetheless, this quartet confirmed what we saw elsewhere this week: a revival in animal spirits.
With the US election and the related mess now in the rear-view mirror, all eyes turn the new mess of governing and negotiating the details of Biden’s policy agenda in a Congress that favors Democrats, just barely. Meanwhile, the pandemic is still raging and economic news remains mixed, which suggests that pressure for results will ramp up quickly for the new administration. As a result, next week will begin to offer a clearer measure of how markets are pricing risk amid political regime change in Washington. ■
Mr. Picerno:
A question and a comment.
How can it be that G.B16.MVOL advances only 0.3 for the past week yet its benchmark (G.B16) goes up 1.4? This seems at odds since, if I understand it, only GCC is missing from G.B16.MVOL during this period.
I find the G.B16.MMD strategy, with its low volatility (6.9) and return (9.9) at 5 year interval, attractive when compared to its benchmark. Yet, the trigger to sell VTI at the week’s start, meant a substantial portion of the portfolio (25%) missed participating in VTI’s 1.9% advance. I appreciate it is foolish to gauge any strategy by a single week. Yet, strictly on an emotional level, this would be hard to stomach.
Thanks as always,
-Dan